Plant Protect. Sci., 2002, 38(11):461-465 | DOI: 10.17221/10524-PPS

In planta and in vitro interactions between Phomopsis (Diaporthe) isolates and sunflower

A.M. Pennisi, M.R. Abenavoli, B. Maimone, L. Di Dio
1 Dipartimento di Agrochimica e Agrobiologia, Università
degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, 89061 Gallina, Reggio Calabria, Italy
2 Dipartimento di Biotecnologie per il Monitoraggio Agroalimentare ed Ambientale Feo di Vito, I-89125 Reggio Calabria, Italy E-mail: ampennisi@unirc.it

In this study, we determined the amount of H2O2 released by sunflower callus cultures challenged by both crude hyphal wall extracts and culture filtrates of 26 Phomopsis isolates from sunflower of worldwide origin (Argentina, France, Italy, Yugoslavia, Rumania). The amount of H2O2 released by callus cultures and the production time-course response, however, did not correlate with both the amount of electrolytes released by sunflower leaf disks treated with crude culture filtrates and the results of pathogenicity tests on sunflower seedlings. Only few isolates induced a time-course response indicative of an oxidative burst. This would suggest that elicitors extracted from hyphal walls are not involved in this host-pathogen recognition system and toxic metabolites produced by Phomopsis in liquid cultures are not pathogenicity factors.

Keywords: Phomopsis helianthi; Diaporthe helianthi; Phomopsis stem canker; sunower; pathogenicity; reactive oxygen species; hydrogen peroxide

Published: December 31, 2002  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pennisi AM, Abenavoli MR, Maimone B, Di Dio L. In planta and in vitro interactions between Phomopsis (Diaporthe) isolates and sunflower. Plant Protect. Sci. 2002;38(SI 2 - 6th Conf EFPP):461-465. doi: 10.17221/10524-PPS.
Download citation

References

  1. BAKER J.C., ORLANDI E.W. (1995): Active oxygen in plant pathogenesis. Ann. Rev. Phytopath., 33: 229-231. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. DALY J.M. (1981): Mechanism of action. In: DURBIN R.D. (ed.): Toxins in Plant Disease. Academic Press, New York: 331-394. Go to original source...
  3. GAMBORG O.L., MILLER R.A., OJIMA R. (1968): Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res., 50: 151-158. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. JIANG Z.Y., WOOLLARD A.C., WOLFF S.P. (1990): Hydrogen peroxide production during experimental protein glycation. FEBS Lett., 268: 69-71. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. KEELING B.L. (1982): A seedling test for resistance to soybean stem canker caused by Diaporthe phaseolorum var. caulivora. Phytopathology, 72: 807-809. Go to original source...
  6. LANGAR K., GRIVEAU Y., VARES D., BERVILLÉ A. (1997): Evaluation of resistance to Phomopsis (Diaporthe helianthi Munt.-Cvet. et al.) on wild species, cultivars and inbreds of sunower (Helianthus spp.) with artificial and seminatural infections. In: Proc. 10th Congr. Mediterranean Phytopathological Union, June 1st-5th, Montpellier-Le Corum, France: 831-837.
  7. MOZZETTI C., AMETEIS N., MATTA A. (1997): Differential responses of cell suspensions of pepper lines susceptible and resistant to Phytophthora capsici Leon. to cell wall and culture filtrate elicitors of Phytophthora spp. J. Plant Path., 78: 27-34.
  8. MUNTAÑOLA-CVETKOVIC M., MIHALJCEVI M., PETROF M. (1981): On the identity of the causative agent of a serious Phomopsis-Diaporthe disease in sunower plants. Nova Hedwigia, 34: 417-435.
  9. PATERSON-ROBINSON K.E., DOUGLAS O.A. (1987): The role of ethylene in the regeneration of Helianthus annuus (sunower) plants from callus. Physiol. Plantarum, 71: 151-156. Go to original source...
  10. PECCHIA S., VERGARA M., CRISTANI C., MERCATELLI E., REGIS C., VANNACCI G. (2002): Genetic variability in differently conserved genomic regions of Diaporthe helianthi isolates of different geografic origin. In: VANNACCI G., S ARROCCO S. (eds): Proc. 6 th Eur. Conf. Fungal Genetics. Pisa, Italy: 440.
  11. P ENNISI A.M., G RANITI A. (1987): Alterazioni della permeabilità cellulare in tessuti di Agrumi infetti da Phoma tracheiphila (Petri) Kanc. et Ghik. Phytopath. Medit., 26: 143-145.
  12. VANNACCI G., PECCHIA S., CACCIOLA S.O., ZAZZERINI A. (1996): Studi sulla variabilità di isolati di Diaporthe helianthi. Petria, 6: 264-265.
  13. VANNACCI G., CACCIOLA S.O., DEL SORBO G., FARETRA F., FIRRAO G., PECCHIA S., POLLASTRO S., RAUDINO F., REGGIO C., REKAB D., VERGARA M. (2002): Analysis of genetic variability in the phytopathogenic fungus Diaporthe helianthi. In: VANNACCI G., SARROCCO S. (eds): Proc. 6th Eur. Conf. Fungal Genetics. Pisa, Italy: 398.
  14. V ERGARA M., C RISTANI C., R EGIS C., V ANNACCI G. (2001): Variability in Diaporthe helianthi isolates of different geographic origin at coding sequences level. J. Plant Pathol., 83: 245.
  15. VIGUIÉ A., VEAR F., TOURVIEILLE DE LABROUHE (1999): Interactions between French isolates of Phomopsis/ Diaporthe helianthi Munt.-Cvet. et al. and sunower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 105: 693-702. Go to original source...
  16. V UKOJEVI J., F RANI -M IHAJLOVI D., M IHALJCEVI M. (1995): In vitro production of perithecia of Diaporthe helianthi. Mycopathologia, 132: 21-25. Go to original source...
  17. V UKOJEVI J., F RANI -M IHAJLOVI D., M IHALJCEVI M. (1996): The comparative investigation of Phomopsis helianthi isolates from different European localities. In: Proc.14th Int. Sunower Conf. II. Beijing-Shenyang. P.R. China: 734-738.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.