Plant Protect. Sci., 2002, 38(11):631-633 | DOI: 10.17221/10576-PPS

Fungi isolated from soil with quicksets of Chamaecyparis lawsoniana and their influence on the growth of Phytophthora cinnamomi and Rhizoctonia solani

H. Kurzawińska, I. Gajda
Department of Plant Protection, Agricultural University of Cracow, 31-425 Cracow, Poland

Chamaecyparis lawsoniana is often attacked by other pathogens (from genera: Phytophthora, Pythium, Fusarium, Rhizoctonia) both when the quicksets are taken root and later, when the young plants are planted. The aim of the study was to determine an effect of saprobiotic fungi isolated from soil with quicksets Chamaecyparis lawsoniana on the growth of Phytophthora cinnamomi and Rhizoctonia solani. In our experiment, method series biotic was used (MAŃKA 1974). This method allowed to determine index of impendence for plants by Phytophthora cinnamomi and Rhizoctonia solani with the help of summary biotic effect. The results of observation on the biotic interaction of saprobiotic fungi isolated from soil with quicksets Chamaecyparis lawsoniana, analysed as biotic series and Phytophthora cinnamomi and Rhizoctonia solani showed, that this of fungal community did not limited growth of these pathogens. Summary biotic effects were negative. Environment of saprobiotic fungi more promoted growth of Rhizoctonia solani than Phytophthora cinnamomi. It means, that in the soil under Chamaecyparis lawsoniana crop, Rhizoctonia solani could have a better of conditions for growth than Phytophthora cinnamomi.

Keywords: biotic effect; Chamaecyparis lawsoniana; soil fungi; Phytophthora cinnamomi; Rhizoctonia solani

Published: December 31, 2002  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kurzawińska H, Gajda I. Fungi isolated from soil with quicksets of Chamaecyparis lawsoniana and their influence on the growth of Phytophthora cinnamomi and Rhizoctonia solani. Plant Protect. Sci. 2002;38(SI 2 - 6th Conf EFPP):631-633. doi: 10.17221/10576-PPS.
Download citation

References

  1. DORENDA M. (1986): Badania mikoflory środowiska uprawnego koniczyny czerwonej i kupkówki pospolitej w aspekcie fitopatologicznym. Acta Mycol., 22: 15-34. Go to original source...
  2. KOWALIK M. (1990): Grzyby zasiedlające rekultywowane grunty zwałowiska Kopalni Siarki "Machów". In: Phytopathol. Pol. Materiały Symp. Niepatogeniczna mikoflora w patologii roślin: 59-68.
  3. KURZAWIŃSKA H. (1995): The effect of fungal communities in soil enviroment under potato crop on the growth of pathogens Fusarium sulphureum Schl. and Fusarium coeruleum (Sacc.) booth depending on nitrogen fertilization. Polish Phytopathol. Soc., Poznań: 337-341.
  4. KURZAWIŃSKA H., P ACYNA E. (2000): Fungi isolated from substrate of tomato plants and their effect on the growth of two tomato pathogens. Phytopath. Pol., 20: 115-121.
  5. ŁABANOWSKI G. et al. (2001): Ochrona drzew i krzewów iglastych. Plantpress, Kraków.
  6. MAŃKA K. (1974): Zbiorowiska grzybów jako kryterium oceny wpływu środowiska na choroby roślin. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 160: 9-23.
  7. MAŃKA M. (1990): Saprofityczna mikoflora środowiska glebowego a zdrowotność roślin. Phytopath. Pol., 11: 122-134.
  8. ORLIKOWSKI L., ORLIKOWSKA T. (1998): Nowoczesna ochrona roślin ozdobnych przed chorobami. In: Ogrodnictwo Przełomu Wieków. Materiały Ogólnopolskiej Konferencji. Kraków: 18-19.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.