Plant Protect. Sci., 2003, 39(2):52-60 | DOI: 10.17221/3826-PPS

Computer-based image analysis to estimate the area of a sticky trap occupied or contaminated by pests

Jan Lukáš, Václav Stejskal
Department of Stored-Product Pest Control, Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic

Traps are tools frequently used to monitor and control pests. Therefore, it is important to study the prerequisites of their use. The instant active area of a trap (the instantly available area of a trap that is able to capture a pest) is a determinant of trap efficacy. However, to measure the instant active trap area is difficult. Therefore, we developed a technique of computer image analysis of digital photography to evaluate the instant active trap area, occupancy (area of insect bodies captured on the trap) and contamination (area of filth left by pests on the trap, such as wing-scales or faeces) of it. This study illustrates its use with two types of sticky traps applied to monitor the German cockroach, Blattella germanica, and the Mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia kuehniella. We found that moths decreased the capacity of the sticky surface more than cockroaches because of its contamination by wing-scales. The sticky trap area covered by wing-scales was nearly as large as the area occupied by moth bodies. Cockroaches contaminated the sticky surface by their faeces but the contaminated area was less than 2% of the area occupied by cockroach bodies. The results indicate that moths are heavy contaminators while cockroaches are weak contaminators of sticky traps.

Keywords: monitoring; traps; digital image analysis; Ephestia kuehniella; Blattella germanica

Published: June 30, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Lukáš J, Stejskal V. Computer-based image analysis to estimate the area of a sticky trap occupied or contaminated by pests. Plant Protect. Sci. 2003;39(2):52-60. doi: 10.17221/3826-PPS.
Download citation

References

  1. A A. (1998): Daily pa ern of trap-catch of German cockroaches (Dictyoptera: Bla ellidae) in kitchens. J. Econ. Entomol., 91: 1136-1141. Go to original source...
  2. B H.J., V D P. (1984): Pheromone trapping for male annihilation: a density dependent model. Protect. Ecol., 7: 281-289.
  3. B D.M., F P., B E.S. (1968): The determination of irregularly-shaped areas of leaves destroyed by chewing insects. Ann. Appl. Biol., 61: 13-17. Go to original source...
  4. B T., S D. (2002): Inspection and grading of agricultural and food products by computer vision systems - a review. Comput. Electr. Agric., 36: 193-213. Go to original source...
  5. C J.F., H D.W. (2001): Patch exploitation by Tribolium castaneum: movement pa erns, distribution and oviposition. J. Stored Prod. Res., 38: 55-68. Go to original source...
  6. C J.F., M M.A., D A.K. (2002): Monitoring stored-product pests in food processing plants with pheromone trapping, contour mapping, and mark-recapture. J. Econ. Entomol., 95: 1089-1101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. D O., S F., Z J. (1995): Quantification of fungal hyphae in leaves of deciduous trees by automated image analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61: 3910-3918. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. H D.W, S B. (2000): Monitoring and Decision Tools. In: S B., H D.W. (eds): Alternatives to Pesticides in Stored-Product IPM. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  9. H W.W. (1988): A photographic technique for tracking herbivory on individual leaves through time. Ecol. Entomol., 13: 359-363. Go to original source...
  10. N G., S C. (2001): Evaluation of a ractants for monitoring populations of the German cockroach (Dictyoptera: Bla ellidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 94: 208-214. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. R A. (1995): Baits for German cockroach control. In: R M., O J., R D.A. (eds): Understanding and controlling the German cockroach. Oxford Univ. Press, New York: 231-265. Go to original source...
  12. R M.D., K D.E., P L.C. (2001): Quantifying turfgrass cover using digital image analysis. Crop Sci., 41: 1884-1888. Go to original source...
  13. S C., H R. (1990): Integrated suppression of synanthropic cockroaches. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 35: 521-551. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. S K.R. (2000): Scientific imaging with digital camera. BioTechniques, 29: 71-75.
  15. S Inc. (1999): SigmaScan Pro 5.0 Users guide. Chi
  16. S cago. of fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae). Dipterolog. Bohemoslov., 5: 117-119.
  17. S V. (1995): The influence of food and shelter on the efficacy of a commercial sticky trap in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res., 31: 229-233. Go to original source...
  18. S V. (1998): Field tests on trapping efficacy of two types of sticky traps for Bla ella orientalis and Bla ella germanica (Bla odea). Anz. Schaedlingskd. Pfl.-Schutz, Umweltschutz., 71: 17-21. Go to original source...
  19. S V. (2002): Modular design of Standard pest monitoring procedure. IOBC Bull., 25: 93-98.
  20. S V., L J. (2002a): Spatial arrangement of Venturia canescens and Ephestia kuehniella in the extremely infested pasta-producing factory: a case history. In: Proc. Cost Action 842, Prague 2002: 116-120.
  21. S V., L J. (2002b): Účinnost nástrahy obsahující fipronil při kontrole rusa domácího v potravinářském závodě. In: D P., R V. (eds): Sbor. Ref. V. Konf. DDD 2002, Poděbrady, 14.-16. 5. 2002: 323-327. Go to original source...
  22. S M., B I., T M. (1990): Management of Prays citri in lemon orchards by mass trapping of males. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 55: 59-67. Go to original source...
  23. S K.O. (1986): Inspection, Diagnosis, Pest Population Monitoring, and Consultation in Urban Management. In: B G.W., O J.M. (eds): Advances in Urban Pest Management. Van Nostrad Reinhold Comp., New York: 69-93.
  24. T P., B F. (1987): Control of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller by mass-trapping. J. Appl. Entomol., 104: 336-340. Go to original source...
  25. W J., L A. (1990). Recapture of marked spruce bark beetles Ips typographus in pheromone traps using area-wide mass trapping. Can. J. For. Res., 20: 1786-1790. Go to original source...
  26. W F. (2002): Scientific digital photography and its application to modern zoological research. In: 6th Centr. Eur. Workshop Soil Zoology, April 23-25, 2001. Inst. Soil Biol., České Budějovice: 259-271.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.