Plant Protect. Sci., 2016, 52(3):158-163 | DOI: 10.17221/117/2015-PPS

Investigation on the incidence of Plum pox virus in fruit nurseries of the Czech RepublicOriginal Paper

Jaroslav Polák, Petr Komínek
Department of Virology and Phytoplasmatology, Division of Crop Protection and Plant Health, Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic

Nine different visual evaluations of Plum pox virus (PPV) presence were carried out in four nurseries during 2012-2015. Results of visual evaluation were verified by ELISA. The presence of PPV was confirmed by ELISA in all the trees showing PPV symptoms. PPV has never been detected by ELISA in trees without PPV symptoms on leaves. A very low occurrence of PPV was proved in plums in all the four nurseries. There were two cases of higher occurrence of PPV in plum cultivars, where PPV originated from infected grafts. The PPV occurrence was 0.126 and 1.59%. The average occurrence of PPV in plums was 0.075%, 93 trees out of 123 630 inspected were PPV-infected. All the PPV-infected trees were destroyed immediately. No new PPV infection was proved later in season (August-September). In comparison with the situation in the 60s of the last century, the PPV occurrence in plums was 2.48% in one nursery in 1963 and there were nurseries with PPV occurrence exceeding 5%. All growing plants were destroyed in this case. The occurrence of PPV in the Czech fruit nurseries today is more than hundred times lower in comparison with the situation fifty years ago. The incidental occurrence of PPV in nurseries cannot be excluded in countries and areas with the endemic presence of PPV (in the Czech Republic and in most European countries). Visual inspection of PPV symptoms in nurseries confirmed by ELISA testing is sufficient. Infected plants must be removed immediately.

Keywords: sharka disease; plum; apricot; peach; incidence; nurseries

Published: September 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Polák J, Komínek P. Investigation on the incidence of Plum pox virus in fruit nurseries of the Czech Republic. Plant Protect. Sci. 2016;52(3):158-163. doi: 10.17221/117/2015-PPS.
Download citation

References

  1. Acuña R. (1993): Outbreaks of Plum pox virus in Chile. European & Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) Conference Plum pox virus, Aug 5-8, 1993, Bordeaux, France. Paris, EPPO.
  2. Atanasoff D. (1933): Plum Pox. A New Virus Disease. Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Sofia Yearbook (1932-1933), Vol. 11: 49-69.
  3. Blattný C. (1930): Poznámky o virových a příbuzných chorobách rostlin I. Ochrana Rostlin, 10: 130-138.
  4. Cambra M., Capote N., Myrta A., Lĺacer G. (2006): Plum pox virus and the estimated costs associated with sharka disease. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 36: 202-204. Go to original source...
  5. Clark M.F., Adams A.N. (1977): Characteristic of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant virus. Journal of General Virology, 34: 51-57. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Dal Zotto A., Ortego J.M., Raigón J.M., Caloggero S., Rossini M., Ducasse C.A. (2006): First report in Argentina of Plum pox virus causing sharka disease in Prunus. Plant Disease, 90: 523. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Dunéz J (1987): Plum pox disease of stone fruit trees. Rome, FAO.
  8. Levy L., Damsteegt V., Welliver R. (2000): First report of Plum pox virus (sharka disease) in Prunus persica in the United States. Plant Disease, 84: 202 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Llácer G., Cambra M., Lavina A. (1985): Detection of plum pox virus in Spain. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 15: 325-329. Go to original source...
  10. Louro D., Corvo L.M. (1985): Occurrence of sharka in Portugal. Acta Horticulturae, 193: 183 Go to original source...
  11. Maejima K., Hoshi H., Hashimoto M., Himeno M., Kawanishi T., Komatsu K., Yamaji Y., Hamamoto H., Namba S. (2010): First report of plum pox virus infecting Japanese apricot (Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc.) in Japan. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 76: 229-231. Go to original source...
  12. Polák J. (1964): Výskyt virových chorob v ovocných školkách okresu Jičín a možnosti ochrany. [Diploma Work.] Prague, Czech University of Agriculture.
  13. Polák J., Oukropec I., Komínek P., Krška B., Bittóová M. (1997): Detection and evaluation of resistance of apricots and peaches to plum pox virus. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz/Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 104: 466-473.
  14. Polák J., Oukropec I., Krška B., Pívalová J., Miller W.R. (2003): Difference in reactions of apricot and peach cultivars to Plum pox virus: serological and symptomatological evaluation. Horticultural Science (Prague), 30: 129-134. Go to original source...
  15. Polák J., Komínek P. (2014): Evaluation of rootstocks of stone fruits for resistance to natural Plum pox virus infection. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 36: 116-120. Go to original source...
  16. Roy A.S., Smith I.M. (1994): Plum pox situation in Europe. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 24: 515-523. Go to original source...
  17. Thompson D., McCann M., MacLeod M., Lye D., Green M., James D. (2001): First report of Plum pox potyvirus in Ontario, Canada. Plant Disease, 85: 97. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.