Plant Protect. Sci., X:X | DOI: 10.17221/15/2025-PPS

From images to insights: Using a convolutional neural network to improve powdery mildew severity detection in mungbeanOriginal Paper

Pitchakon Papan1, Witsarut Chueakhunthod1,4, Chanwit Kaewkasi2, Wanploy Jinagool1, Akkawat Tharapreuksapong3, Teerayoot Girdthai1, Kanlayanee Sawangsalee1, Piyada Alisha Tantasawat ORCID...1
1 School of Crop Production Technology, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
2 School of Computer Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
3 Center for Scientific and Technological Equipment, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailan
4 Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand


To efficiently identify powdery mildew (PM) severity in mungbean leaves, we developed a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) approach and validated its effectiveness against human evaluation. We fine-tuned an EfficientNet-B3 pre-trained model, which, in our related studies, performed better than re-implemented Inception V3 models. The CNN was trained on 90% of the images (2 880) for training and 10% (320) for validation, with data augmentation applied using Python and TensorFlow. The model obtained 82.10% and 73.03% as training and validation accuracies after 14 epochs, respectively. Further analysis with an additional 15 datasets revealed PM disease indices ranging from 2.03 (resistance) to 6.45 (high susceptibility). The concordance between AI-predicted and human-assessed PM severity was 74.4% (adjusted R2: 72.4%), with an average root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.854 and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.715, indicating moderate predictive error. Comparison of our developed AI-based application prototype on smartphones with expert evaluations yielded a strong correlation (r = 0.992**, R2 = 0.984), suggesting that this tool can effectively estimate PM severity across mungbean cultivars. The application shows considerable promise, and further optimisation and strategic dissemination efforts will enhance its adoption among farmers. 

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; deep learning; EfficientNet-B3; machine learning; Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek; visual observation

Received: February 2, 2025; Revised: January 8, 2026; Accepted: January 11, 2026; Prepublished online: June 9, 2026 

Download citation

References

  1. Ahmed A.A., Reddy G.H. (2021): A mobile-based system for detecting plant leaf diseases using deep learning. AgriEngineering, 3: 478‒493. Go to original source...
  2. Albattah W., Javed A., Nawaz M., Masood M., Albahli S. (2022): Artificial intelligence-based drone system for multiclass plant disease detection using an improved efficient convolutional neural network. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13: 808380. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Cook R.J. (2000): Advances in plant health management in the twentieth century. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 38: 95‒116. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Dargan S., Kumar M., Ayyagari M.R., Kumar G. (2020): A survey of deep learning and its applications: A new paradigm to machine learning. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 27: 1071‒1092. Go to original source...
  5. Dey A.K., Sharma M., Meshram M.R. (2016): Image processing-based leaf rot disease, detection of betel vine (Piper betle L.). Procedia Computer Science, 85: 748‒754. Go to original source...
  6. Ferentinos K.P. (2018): Deep learning models for plant disease detection and diagnosis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 145: 311‒318. Go to original source...
  7. Hacquard S. (2014): The genomics of powdery mildew fungi: Past achievements, present status and future prospects. Advances in Botanical Research, 70: 109‒142. Go to original source...
  8. Kelly L.A., Vaghefi N., Bransgrove K., Fechner N.A., Stuart K., Pandey A.K., Sharma M., Németh M.Z., et al. (2021): One crop disease, how many pathogens? Podosphaera xanthii and Erysiphe vignae sp. nov. identified as the two species that cause powdery mildew of mungbean (Vigna radiata) and black gram (V. mungo) in Australia. Phytopathology, 111: 1193‒1206. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Khajudparn P., Wongkaew S., Tantasawat P. (2010): Identification of genes for powdery mildew resistance in mungbean. Journal of Life Sciences, 4: 25‒29.
  10. Krizhevsky A., Sutskever I., Hinton G.E. (2017): ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Communications of the ACM, 60: 84‒90. Go to original source...
  11. Kumar S., Deo M.M., Kumar K., Rathore M., Akram M., Pratap A. (2023): Detection and classification of yellow mosaic disease in Vigna mungo using convolutional neural network deep learning models. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 29: S177‒S181. Go to original source...
  12. Mallick M.T., Biswas S., Das A.K., Saha H.N., Chakrabarti A., Deb N. (2023): Deep learning based automated disease detection and pest classification in Indian mung bean. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82: 12017‒12041. Go to original source...
  13. Mohanty S.P., Hughes D.P., Salathé M. (2016): Using deep learning for image-based plant disease detection. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: 1419. Go to original source...
  14. Nair R., Schreinemachers P. (2020): Global status and economic importance of mungbean. In: Nair R., Schafleitner R., Lee S.-H. (eds): The Mungbean Genome. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham: 1‒8. Go to original source...
  15. Pandey A.K., Burlakoti R.R. Kenyon L., Nair R.M. (2018): Perspectives and challenges for sustainable management of fungal diseases of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek var. radiata]: A review. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 6: 53. Go to original source...
  16. Papan P., Chueakhunthod W., Kaewkasi C., Jinagool W., Tharapreuksapong A., Masari A., Ngampongsai S., Sawangsalee K., et al. (2025): Artificial intelligence-based detection of Cercospora leaf spot disease severity in mungbean. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 85: 396‒404. Go to original source...
  17. Parvez M.T., Paul S.K., Sarkar M.A.R. (2013): Yield and yield contributing characters of mungbean as affected by variety and level of phosphorus. Journal of Agroforestry and Environment, 7: 115‒118.
  18. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (2025): Index Fungorum. Available at: www.indexfungorum.org (Accessed Dec 23, 2025)
  19. Simonyan K., Zisserman A. (2015): Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition.  In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, May 7-9, 2015, San Diego, USA.
  20. Szegedy C., Liu W., Jia Y., Sermanet P., Reed S., Anguelov D., Erhan D., Vanhoucke V., et al. (2015): Going deeper with convolutions. In: Proc. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, Jun 7‒12, 2015: 1‒9. Go to original source...
  21. Verma R., Kushwaha K.P.S., Bijlwan A., Bisht A.S. (2024): Enhancing urad bean (Vigna mungo L.) crop management with machine learning: Predictive analysis of pod rot severity and pod bug incidence patterns. Australasian Plant Pathology, 53: 273‒283. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0.), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.