Plant Protect. Sci., 2012, 48(10):S11-S15 | DOI: 10.17221/58/2012-PPS

Effect of MON 810 cultivation and prevention to adventitious presence in non-GM fields: A case study in Slovakia

Peter Mihalčík1, Katarína Hrčková1, Martin Singer2, Anna Plačková3, Ján Kraic1
1 Institute of Plant Production - Plant Production Research Center Piešťany, Piešťany, Slovak Republic
2 Monsanto Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic
3 Monsanto Slovakia, Bratislava, Slovak Republic

The efficiency of border rows to prevent the adventitious presence of GM maize in non-GM maize plots was evaluated as well as the effect of the MON 810 maize of the yield and self-protection against the European corn borer. The GM maize MON 810 event was drilled at 3 locations over the Slovakia and the grain samples were collected from the neighbouring conventional maize fields. The data obtained by Real-Time PCR indicate that coexistence between GM and conventional maize is feasible and the isolation distance of 200 m (respectively 100 border rows of conventional maize) separates GM maize from the conventional one more than sufficiently. The effective isolation distance is 3-4 times greater than the actually needed. The MON 810 revealed also the highest yield and the best self-protection against European corn borer in both growing seasons with different climatic conditions.

Keywords: GM crop; maize; MON 810; coexistence; isolation distance; yield; resistance

Published: December 31, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mihalčík P, Hrčková K, Singer M, Plačková A, Kraic J. Effect of MON 810 cultivation and prevention to adventitious presence in non-GM fields: A case study in Slovakia. Plant Protect. Sci. 2012;48(Special Issue):S11-15. doi: 10.17221/58/2012-PPS.
Download citation

References

  1. Andersen M,N., Sausse C., Lacroix B., Caul S., Messéan A. (2007): Agricultural studies of GM maize and the field experimental infrastructure of ECOGEN. Pedobiologia, 51: 175-184. Go to original source...
  2. Chilcutt C.F., Tabashnik B.E. (2004): Contamination of refuges by Bacillus thuringiensis toxin genes from transgenic maize. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USA, 101: 7526-7529. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Demont M., Tollens J. (2004): First impact of biotechnology in the EU: Bt maize adoption in Spain. Annals of Applied Biology, 145: 197-207. Go to original source...
  4. Devos Y., Reheul D., Thas O., De Clercq E.M., Cougnon M., Cordemans K. (2007): Implementing isolation perimeters around genetically modified maize fields. Agronomy and Sustainable Development, 27: 155-165. Go to original source...
  5. Devos Y., Demont M., Dillen K., Reheul D., Kaiser M., Sanvido O. (2009): Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29: 11-30. Go to original source...
  6. Gustafson D.I., Brants I.O., Horak M.J., Remund K.M., Rosenbaum E.W., Soteres J.K. (2006): Empirical modeling of genetically modified maize grain production practices to achieve European Union labeling thresholds. Crop Science, 46: 2133-2140. Go to original source...
  7. James C. (2011): Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/ GM Crops: 2011. ISAAA Brief No. 43. The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA), Ithaca, USA.
  8. Messean A., Angevin F., Gomez-Barbero M., Menradand K., Rodriguez-Cerezo E. (2006): New case studies on the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in European agriculture. Technical Report Series EUR 22102 EN.
  9. Messeguer J., Peñas G., Ballester J., Bas M., Serra J., Salvia J., Palaudelmàs M., Melé E. (2006): Pollenmediated gene flow in maize in real situations of coexistence. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 4: 633-645. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Park J., McFarlane I., Phipps R., Ceddia G. (2011). The impact of the EU regulatory constraint of transgenic crops on farm income. New Biotechnology, 28: 396-406. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Sanvido O., Widmer F., Winzeler M., Streit B., Szerencsits E., Bigler F. (2008): Definition and feasibility of isolation distances for transgenic maize cultivation. Transgenic Research, 17: 317-335. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Van De Wiel C.C.M., Groeneveld R.M.W., Dolstra O., Kok E.J., Scholtens I.M.J., Thissen J.T.N.M., Smulders M.J.M., Lotz L.A.P. (2009): Pollen-mediated gene flow in maize tested for coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in the Netherlands: effect of isolation distances between fields. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 56: 405-423. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.