Plant Protect. Sci., 2023, 59(4):348-355 | DOI: 10.17221/33/2023-PPS

The importance of local faunal research of moths for plant protection: an example from an agricultural landscape in central EuropeOriginal Paper

Vendula Hrubešová1, Hana Šefrová ORCID...2, Zdeněk Laštůvka ORCID...3
1 Ivančice-Letkovice, Czech Republic
2 Department of Crop Science, Breeding and Plant Medicine, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
3 Department of Zoology, Fisheries, Hydrobiology and Apiculture, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

The study was carried out in the agricultural landscape (mosaic of an urban environment, gardens, grassland, fields, small forests and semi-natural non-forest habitats) in central Europe (southeast Czechia) in 2021. A light trap was used for trapping (207 nights). A total of 485 moth species and 5 170 individuals were captured. Eurytopic species dominated the area, 72% of species and 89% of individuals. Fifty-nine species are considered pests (12%), representing 25% of individuals. The seasonal dynamics of selected harmful species were evaluated and discussed. Species of semi-natural dry and wet habitats were represented by 14%, i.e. a proportion comparable to pests, but with only 4% of individuals. The numbers of species and individuals recorded and the Shannon-Wiener diversity and evenness indices are lower than at natural sites. Yet, overall biodiversity is relatively high, including the presence of some rare, ecologically, or zoogeographically remarkable species.

Keywords: agricultural landscape; Lepidoptera; light trap; pests; natural habitat species

Received: April 5, 2023; Revised: September 18, 2023; Accepted: October 2, 2023; Prepublished online: November 13, 2023; Published: November 28, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hrubešová V, Šefrová H, Laštůvka Z. The importance of local faunal research of moths for plant protection: an example from an agricultural landscape in central Europe. Plant Protect. Sci. 2023;59(4):348-355. doi: 10.17221/33/2023-PPS.
Download citation

Supplementary files:

Download file33-2023_PPS_ESM.pdf

File size: 285.57 kB

References

  1. Botham M.S., Fernandez-Ploquin E.C., Brereton T., Harrower C.A., Roy D.B., Heard M.S. (2015): Lepidoptera communities across an agricultural gradient: how important are habitat area and habitat diversity in supporting high diversity? Journal of Insect Conservation, 19: 403-420. Go to original source...
  2. CHMI (2023): Portál ČHMÚ - historická data [Czech Hydrometeorological Institute - historical data]. Online at: https: //www.chmi.cz/historicka-data/pocasi/uzemni-teploty (accessed July 6, 2023).
  3. Dykyjová D. (ed.) (1989): Metody studia ekosystémů [Methods of ecosystem research]. Praha, Academia. (in Czech)
  4. Ekroos J., Heliölä J., Kuussaari M. (2010): Homogenisation of lepidopteran communities in intensively cultivated agricultural landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology, Go to original source...
  5. 47: 459-467.
  6. Elsner G., Huemer P., Tokár Z. (1999): Die Palpenmotten (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) Mitteleuropas. Bratislava, F. Slamka. (in German)
  7. Hluchý M., Dobšík B. (1984): Pokus o zhodnocení hospodářského významu můrovitých (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) žijících v agrobiocenózách Mikulovska [An Attempt to Assess the Economic Importance of Lepidoptera (Noctuidae) Living in the Agrobiocenoses of the Mikulov region]. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae (Brno), Facultas Agronomica, 32: 145-151. (in Czech)
  8. Kadlec T., Kotela M.A.A.M., Novák I., Konvička M., Jarošík V. (2009): Effect of land use and climate on the diversity of moth guilds with different habitat specialisation. Community Ecology, 10: 152-158. Go to original source...
  9. Kůdela V., Kocourek F. (2002): Seznam škodlivých organismů rostlin [List of Species Injurious to Plants]. Praha, Agrospoj. (in Czech)
  10. Laštůvka Z., Liška J. (2011): Annotated Checklist of Moths and Butterflies of the Czech Republic (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Brno, Biocont Laboratory.
  11. Miller F. (1956): Zemědělská entomologie [Agricultural Entomology]. Praha, ČSAV. (in Czech)
  12. Nacambo S., Leuthardt F.L.G., Wan H., Li H., Haye T., Baur B., Weiss R.M., Kenis M. (2014): Development characteristics of the box-tree moth Cydalima perspectalis and its potential distribution in Europe. Journal of Applied Entomology, 138: 14-26. Go to original source...
  13. Odum E.P. (1971): Fundamentals of Ecology. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders.
  14. Patočka J., Kulfan J. (2009): Lepidoptera of Slovakia, Bionomics and Ecology. Bratislava, VEDA.
  15. Razowski J. (2001): Die Tortriciden (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) Mitteleuropas. Bratislava, F. Slamka. (in German)
  16. Šafář J. (2010): Velcí noční motýli (Lepidoptera) severního okraje města Brna (Řečkovice) [Large Moths (Lepidoptera) of the Northern Outskirts of Brno (Řečkovice)]. Klapalekiana, 46: 205-220. (in Czech)
  17. Šefrová H. (2003): Změny ve škodlivosti druhů řádu Lepidoptera na polních, zahradních a okrasných rostlinách v průběhu 20. století [Changes of Lepidopteran Pests in Agriculture, Horticulture and in Ornamental Cultures during the 20th Century]. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 51: 7-18. (in Czech)
  18. VÚMOP (2022): Výzkumný ústav meliorací a ochrany půdy; eKatalog BPEJ [Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation]. Available at: https://bpej.vumop.cz/25500. (accessed October 22, 2022)
  19. Wolda H., Marek J., Spitzer K., Novák I. (1994): Diversity and variability of Lepidoptera populations in urban Brno, Czech Republic. European Journal of Entomology, 91: 213-226.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.